Thursday, December 6, 2012

2nd Essay



Jessica Klase
English 115
Professor Rowley
22 October 2012
Wall-e: Creating a new age for our children
The many scenes of ecological devastation in Wall-e that were created by human’s wastefulness have sparked many a discussion in the families who have seen the movie about if they should expose their children to these ideas or not. In the movie there are giant towers of trash that humans left behind for their robots to clean up. The robots (collectively called Wall-e) have stopped functioning, but one is still operating, although the rest have shut down. Seeing the brown skies and landscape in the movie has even shocked some people into inventing new systems to lessen their impact on the environment by inventing the systems you see advertised like solar water heating systems or bringing bags to the grocery store for their groceries. Seeing the direction we are going is hard which is why some adults simply ignore what is happening. We have seen movies with this environmental moral before, but this time it is directed towards our children. The filmmakers seem to be targeting our children as our “last hope”, this begs the question, how does seeing movies with a “green” message affect our children? Our children now grow up seeing this message everywhere, and will take their chance to stop our path when they get older.
This generation will be the first to grow up with this message in the popular media. There have been documentaries about this issue before, but they are often from fringe groups. For example, there are documentaries about people who have lived for weeks in trees, such as Julia Butterfly Hill, but most people have never heard of them. For the first time even children are being focused on as a way to change. Many people may not agree with doing this because they want their children to have their childhood, not be scared that what they do every day, such as drive to school, could eventually kill their planet. This is a valid point, but childhood is not what it used to be. As said by Vivian C. Sobchack, “This new interest in violence and its new formal treatment… satisfied an intensified cultural desire for “close-up” knowledge about the material fragility of bodies…” (431). This is an example of how childhood is changing, violence is in many more movies, and our children do see it. Childhood is less sheltered than it used to be. This isn’t always a bad thing, sometimes it opens up opportunities to teach our children. Wall-e takes advantage of the same effect, but uses it to teaching our children about how we effect our environment.
Wall-e aims their message at children because, eventually, they will inherit the earth. As their parents grow old and leave this life they will still be here, living their daily lives. Wall-e teaches children now because if they grow up with this message they will not forget it. The movie delivers its message in a new way, as A. O. Scott admits in his article “In a World Left Silent, One heart Beeps”, “Not that Wall-E is all gloom and doom. It is, undoubtedly, an earnest (though far from simplistic) ecological parable”. This message will stick with them, and for some it will inspire them. The goal is to change their behavior so that they can make a difference. This concept is much like what Christian families do to try and encourage their children to become Christian themselves. Many church-going families have their children go to “Sunday school” to learn about the bible and to have them grow up with the Christian message. Wall-e uses the same technique to try and save our planet.
            Some companies may oppose this because those companies benefit from harming our planet. Big oil companies certainly have a hand in the buildup of greenhouse gases in our atmosphere, and also have a reputation for using their major influences in politics to their own ends. Many big oil companies have extreme influences on our government by funding the campaigns of politicians they want to win. This is common practice now, but our children could change that. Changing the way our children think with mainstream media that has messages like Wall-e could damage their profits. By extension, Wall-e could play a role in taking down big oil companies and other companies such as logging companies. For the current American this might be unthinkable, most of the population in America has a car. By changing childhood, Wall-e could even change the roll of some of the largest companies in America.
            Wall-e is a highly successful film, and other films like it are sure to follow. The Lorax (2012), which is about pollution and cutting down trees, shows that this trend in film is likely to continue, it made $70,217,070 on its opening weekend and was ranked first out of the films that came out on in the same weekend. As a Disney/Pixar classic Wall-e alone could affect the mindset of multiple generations of children. Many different films with the same message could make this a common theme in childhood. During childhood there normally aren’t many worries aside from the occasional missed teddy-bear. Movies could change the generally accepted purpose of childhood. Childhood could stop being a time where you develop in a nurturing environment to when you are taught about the world in a hope to change it, in this case learning to take care of the planet. This may not be an obvious change, just as Wall-e is an entertaining way to teach about how we effect our environment, but it could be a big one. Most children’s films don’t have a message that will change how you live, but a new trend could be arising, films for children with a higher purpose. Movies are a wonderful way to teach children because they enjoy watching, but what will we teach them next?
            Over the years there have been film genres that have affected the way we think before. David Denby says in the “Postmorbid Condition” says, “They [the films] wouldn’t survive if they didn’t provide emotional satisfaction to the people who make them and to the audiences who watch them.” (425). This suggests that movies with a “green” message satisfy a need to find a solution to the problem of our harsh impact on the world. In Wall-e the humans correct their mistake by coming back from space to clean up the planet and to create a new lifestyle, one that helps the planet rather than destroys it. This might be what we want for our children, a way for them to live without the fear that one day their actions will destroy the only known place that they can live. As adults the general population is already making steps to make our day-to-day activities safer for the world around us. We use hybrid cars, solar heating systems, and green buildings to help is toward our goal, but we still aren’t there. The popularity of this movie shows that on some level, we feel guilty because of what we are doing to our planet.
            One way this movie could help resolve our guilt is by showing a solution. This will make the movie live on in our memories. In the movie the children who come back to live on Earth are taught how to care for it. As the end credits role there are scenes of children playing outside, fishing, and planting. These scenes affect our children by giving them an unwritten expectation that they should be doing this. Saving the planet is a heavy weight to put on a child’s shoulders, but passing the solution to someone else feels good to us. Children now grow up being taught that we are hurting the planet, but may be confused because we are not stopping what we are doing. To children we look like hypocrites because we show them a movie where trash has overrun our planet, but we still make use of all of the resources that we have and fill up our trash bags. Childhood is becoming much more complicated, and will continue to be because of the popularity of these movies, but will also put new responsibilities on our children.
            Children are our future, our pride and our hope. What we show them now will affect their whole lives. Environmental films make them into our solution. Now they will grow up knowing that the path humanity is on could destroy our whole planet. This makes life confusing because we aren’t doing all we can to save it, in fact we aren’t doing a lot to save it. Wall-e could make childhood into a time to learn about the problems Earth has and give them time to find answers to fix them. The generation that is seeing these films now could grow up to change how we live in order to better preserve the planet, and topple huge corporations who benefit from the destruction of the planet, companies that happen to be some of the most influential of our time. Wall-e changes the mindset that because you are a child, you can’t change anything. Wall-e changes childhood into a force to stop evils in the world, to enhance our world. The childhood of future generations will change into a period to mold them into solutions that our planet needs.



Works cited

Maasik, Sonia, Solomon, Jack. Signs of Life in the USA: Readings on Popular Culture for
Writers. Bedford/St. Martin's 2012, seventh edition. The Postmorbid Condition
David Denby
Maasik, Sonia, Solomon, Jack. Signs of Life in the USA: Readings on Popular Culture for
Writers. Bedford/St. Martin's 2012, seventh edition. High School Confidential: Notes
Teen Movies. Vivian C. Sobchack
Scott, A. O. "In a World Left Silent, One Heart Beeps." The New York Times 27 June 2008, Movie Review sec.: E1. Nytimes.com. 27 June 2008. Web. 29 Oct. 2012.
"Box Office Mojo." Box Office Mojo. N.p., n.d. Web. 05 Nov. 2012. <http://boxofficemojo.com/>.

1st essay



Jessica Klase                                                        
Prof. Kelly Rowley
English 115
Sept. 23, 2012

The Deaf World Through Hearing Eyes

            I walked into the silent room, at Balboa Park in San Diego, where so many conversations were going on that the visual din was almost unbearable. I felt like I was in way over my head; I had only started learning American Sign Language a year before, and I was nowhere close to fluent. The little confidence I had was given to me by my friend who was at about the same level in the language as I was; we were going to tackle deaf awareness day together. The layout of the room was nice and open, so that you could see another person signing from across the room and not interrupt the presentation on the main stage. Walking through conversations was unavoidable, so I saw the sign for “excuse me” signed more times than I could count. The animated expressiveness of everyone's face was a huge contrast to what I normally saw in hearing culture, because these expressions in sign language help the other person understand what you were saying. American Sign Language had influenced almost everything in this room, everything in the room was geared toward the eyes, not the ears, and the culture felt like a hidden gem, an unusual treasure that could only be reached through ASL, by talking to its members. Tapping a stranger’s shoulder to help another person get their attention is commonplace. The visual nature of the language had changed the culture of the room dramatically. Culture and language are twisted and knotted into an almost inseparable mass; without American Sign Language I wouldn’t even know that the culture existed. 
            I learned how to adjust to Deaf culture extremely quickly, like what questions were ok to ask and what others would start a fight. One subject that is highly controversial in Deaf culture is cochlear implants. They are controversial in the Deaf community because many Deaf people don’t see deafness as a handicap. They are proud of being deaf and they like the community they’re in because of this. When cochlear implants were created the hearing parents, of deaf children felt they could “fix” their children, which isn’t true. This is a large issue because 90% of Deaf children are born to hearing parents, and there is often a language barrier. Before I started to learn the language and met Deaf people this confused me because I couldn’t imagine not wanting to hear and the different path my life would have taken if I hadn’t been born with the ability to hear. It was especially hard for me as a musician to imagine not being able to hear, let alone how different life would have been for me because sound is so important. For Deaf people this makes them unique and they even set themselves apart in the English language, using a capital “D”  to indicate a person who is culturally Deaf and a lower case “d” for the medical point of view of being deaf, or unable to hear. Eventually I learned the differences, although it was hard to grasp at first; after meeting Deaf people everything seemed to finally come into focus.
 The Deaf community was extremely different from anything I had ever seen. After coming into the community, I became acutely aware of the struggles many deaf people. Before, when I was in the “hearing” world and I met a deaf person I changed. I was the typical hearing person that would have said “Poor person, I wish I could fix them.” Learning ASL and meeting different deaf people showed me that it isn’t crucial to fix them, and sometimes there is nothing to fix. Changing my view showed me how the general population saw deaf people and how I had been one of them. The people who surprised me the most were the hearing people who would get frustrated and just give up. Now, after I meet a Deaf person they are relieved that I can sign and we always get along wonderfully.
In the Deaf community I was more outgoing because of how friendly everyone was. I made friends faster and I was accepted more often. Not only did my personality change in the Deaf community, but it did in the outside world as well. I even changed the career I wanted to go into, majoring in Deaf Studies instead of music. I became a sort of unofficial teacher to those around me about the Deaf community and what it was like. My “Deaf-World” personality would always be more outgoing, yet intimidated at the same time because I was always afraid to make mistakes in front of people who knew the language better than me. This “new me” was completely different than anything I had ever been before, and often times it confused me because it was almost a paradox of the “me” in the hearing world. This paradox was largely created by the fact that everyone I met was extremely nice, yet I was nervous to meet new people and use ASL because I was still learning it. Eventually I got more comfortable in my own skin, but the nervousness because I was learning about the culture still remained.
 My introduction to the community through the language changed my view on all foreign languages and communication in general. Before I learned ASL I didn’t have an opinion on access to information but after experiencing firsthand what that can do to a community and to people when they have no access I quickly saw it was wrong. I was shown this through the Deaf community and my eyes opened to how our country doesn’t provide for people who don’t speak the same language. Although the Deaf community exists in America not many people are exposed to it particularly because it is a small group of people, and you need to learn ASL to be a part of it. This makes is hard to get services for the deaf in ASL in some areas. In America, because there are so many languages and cultures most people would think that it would be easy to get services in those languages, but this is not always the case. Many places in America are hard to access for those who speak different languages or use American Sign Language to communicate. When I realized how hard it could be for deaf people I became determined to learn ASL.
American Sign Language makes Deaf culture tight-knit because there is no true “Deaf country” in the world where everyone uses ASL, so the language is always a minority language. Learning this language has made me a more culturally sensitive person and has given me a culture that I can rely on. The culture is normally very accepting of people who know ASL and are supportive, because not everyone knows the language, so when you find someone who does know it you want to get to know them. ASL has created customs in Deaf culture because of its visual nature, like tapping a stranger on the shoulder to help someone trying to get their attention. When two people who sign meet each other outside of the Deaf community most of the time they will have many shared experiences, especially if they are Deaf. Signers and Deaf people will typically get along well because they have that language in common and share many experiences with each other. Deaf culture exists because there is a group of people that use and depend on ASL every day, and if I had never started to learn the language I would have never become a part of it or found my major.

Wednesday, November 14, 2012

The New Mind of Technology


Johnny 5 from Short Circuit


In the article Artificial Minds Jason Holt discusses the implications of artificial intelligence. He questions if it does already exists and if we are, as we tend to think, better that it. Artificial intelligence has been discussed for many years, and we have all seen the movies where robots take over the world and destroy humans, although I believe there is a different side to the story. In movie Short Circuit a robot made to be a soldier and to kill gets hit by lighting and gains consciousness. Now I believe that some of you are a ready scared about what this robot does, but it might surprise you to hear that he wanted nothing to do with violence. There is a scene where he is content to do nothing but roll down a road and look around. This is an example of what artificial intelligence could be. Having robots as companions might actually be a good thing, a friend that we can depend to be on whenever we need them. However, I do believe that having robots replace humans would be negative; we do need contact with our own kind. This knew fear of artificial intelligence reminds me of a story that I once heard about the people in Italy being afraid to eat tomatoes, which we know to be in hundreds of Italian dishes today. Humans should not necessarily be afraid of having computers that can think like we do, there may be a silver lining in disguise in the improvements of this science.

The Children of the Future




The opening to the movie A.I Artificial Minds is certainly an attention-getter. The very first thing you see is waves rolling up and down while a man states in a rather matter-of-fact manner that the polar icecaps melted, causing the seas to rise and erase many cities. As natural resources dwindled strict regulations were placed on pregnancy, which led to the rise of robots. Robots seem to be a wonderful solution because they don’t need any resources to sustain them. Soon we see what seems to be a board meeting; the members discuss creating the perfect robotic child, for the couples who now cannot have a child of their own.  Personally I am torn between two opinions. The first is that they should never make a robotic child because it goes against nature; the second is that they should, because it would help the many couples who are sure to desperately want a child. The child that would be created would never age, get sick, or fall and scrape its knee as all children do, which I would find almost eerie. I feel that, in addition, one of the greatest parts of being a parent is seeing what your child comes to be, like watching a seed that you have no idea what kind it will be turn into a beautiful flower. On the other hand, the couples out in the world are sure to feel a loss, a place in the house that should be filled but they can’t but is this really parenthood? Yes the robot love you but it will never grow.

Monday, November 12, 2012

How We Are Cyborgs

Friend or Foe?
In the article "Can You Hear Me Now?" Sherry Turkle discusses how people in general have become dependent on technology and how it has permeated our lives. Now it is common place to see people walking down the street e-mailing or texting away. Our culture now uses technology to make childhood safer, but that could also damage their independence when the children get older. Our culture now uses technology to provide companions and to define us. To contrast, in the article "Gin, Television, and Surplus" Clay Shirky argues that because or technology we now have the time and the ability to be a part or the media. Shirky Believes this is better than merely watching it.

"Can You Hear Me Now?" has a negative tone to it, as if technology would soon become the bane of our society. From her viewpoint technology is bad, but Shirky thinks it is grand. Shirky is positive toward technology and thinks it is better than the alternative.

I believe that Turkle does the better job of arguing her point although I agree more with Shirky.

Wednesday, November 7, 2012

The veldt




In the futuristic short story “The Veldt” two wealthy parents live in a mechanized house with their two children. One of the features of the home is a computerized nursery that makes the children’s every wish reality. When the nursery starts to display an all too real and death-filled African veldt, the mother starts to worry. Once she finally gets the father to realize that there is trouble they call the psychiatrist  too look at the nursery and they shut they house off, meaning they have to clean, bathe, and even tie their own shoes. The children through a fit and look the parents in the nursery in with the lions, and once the psychiatrist returns, do the same with him.
For some time I have seen children be spoiled rotten. You see them everywhere, in your family, grocery stores, toy stores, most stores, and their tantrums can get on everyone’s nerves sometimes. This story takes it to a new level, murder. I found it interesting how they children, with the help of the house, could be pretty much independent. The children have the means to go places they want too, get their own food, get wash, and live in a very comfortable environment. I believe that this could have interfered with their mental state, making it partially adult, but still very child-like. This is dangerous to the parents in the end and kills them. The abundance of technology in the house makes the children dependent on it, so when the parents go around and turn everything off it is a huge shock and pushes them over the edge. For months before, when the children started to be dissatisfied with their parents, the children had been creating facsimiles of their parents and feeding them to the lions. This shows that having so much given to them had altered the children’s minds and had made them dangerous. I believe in a way this is the parent’s fault, but the parents did it with the best intentions. This story shows that sometimes we can nurture too much, and if we give everything to our children without making them work it damages them in a way. The story shows that you can indeed be spoiled rotten.
“The house is wife and mother and now nursemaid. Can I compete with an African veldt?” pg. 10
This interested me because the mother is first to see a problem, the father shrugs it off.
“Those screams- they sound familiar.”
 This line was a little creepy to me because the parents didn’t go check out the screams, no matter how familiar.